Location-based access control for wireless local area networks

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278

Attorney Docket No. 3655-0133FPC

PCT/US2003/015073

LOCATION-BASED ACCESS CONTROL FOR WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORKS

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

[01] The present invention relates to a wireless, local area network (LAN). More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for preventing unauthorized use of a wireless LAN.

2. Description of the Related Art

[02] Wireless LANs are a popular and inexpensive way to allow multiple users of “stations” to communicate with each other, to access a wired LAN, to access a local server, to access a remote server, such as over the Internet, etc.. A “station” is a piece of equipment, such as a laptop computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a pager, a cellular phone, or similar device. The station includes a wireless transceiver which can communicate with an access point. The communication can occur via radio waves, infrared, or any other known form of wireless communication. The access point allows wireless stations to communicate with each other and to communicate with infrastructure connected to the access point.

[03] The server can provide services, such as access to applications like an email system, a word processing program, an accounting system and/or a dedicated database. Wireless LANs are employed within such facilities as businesses, university classrooms or buildings, airport lounges, hotel meeting rooms, etc. When a user is physically located in the

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278

Attorney Docket No. 3655-0133FPC

PCT/US2003/015073 vicinity of an access point, the transceiver of the station communicates with the access point and a connection to the wireless LAN is established.

[04] One problem with wireless LANs is unauthorized users. An unauthorized user can position an unauthorized station on the outskirts of the transmission/reception area of the access point, such as in a parking lot, and “hack” into the wireless LAN. The unauthorized user can then use the LAN services without paying a subscriber fee. This leads to lost revenues and slows down the applications for the authorized subscribers. More importantly, the unauthorized user can often gain access to sensitive data, and/or can cause destruction or corruption of application programs and data on the wireless LAN.

[05] One solution to unauthorized users of wireless LANs has been to employ user names and passwords. Such a measure is successful to some extent. However, sophisticated hackers can still bypass user name and password protection systems. Since transmissions between the stations and the access point are wireless, it is possible to intercept a transmission, as an authorized users logs on, to decode a key code, the valid user name and password, and to then break into the wireless LAN. Further, other more sophisticated techniques are available. Therefore, there exists a need in the art for a system and method, which assists in preventing unauthorized users from gaining access to a wireless LAN.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[06] It is an object of the present invention to address one or more of the drawbacks associated with the related art.

[07] It is a further object of the present invention to enhance the security of a wireless LAN.

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278 PCT/US2003/015073

Attorney Docket No. 3655-0133FPC

[08] These and other objects are accomplished by a system pertaining to, and a method of operating, a wireless LAN, which prevents unauthorized users from accessing the wireless LAN. A signal strength of a station attempting to access the wireless LAN is measured. If the signal strength is less than a predetermined threshold value, the system concludes that the station is outside of an authorized geographical area. Such a station attempting to establish a connection is characterized as an unauthorized station, and access to the wireless LAN is denied. The system may also periodically verify that authorized stations remain within the authorized geographical area. A station that has moved outside of the authorized geographical area can be notified or denied further access to the wireless LAN.

[09] Other objects and further scope of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[10] The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus, are not limitative of the present invention, and wherein:

[11] Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating a wireless LAN, in accordance with the present invention;

[12[ Figure 2 is a floor plan of a business employing the wireless LAN;

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278 PCT/US2003/015073

Attorney Docket No. 3655-O133FPC

[13] Figure 3 is a flow chart illustrating a method for allowing a wireless station access to the wireless LAN;

[14] Figure 4 is a floor plan of an airport lounge employing the wireless LAN; and

[15] Figure 5 is a flow chart illustrating a method for verifying that wireless stations on the wireless LAN remain within a predefined geographical service area.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[16] Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating a wireless LAN, in accordance with the present invention. The wireless LAN includes at least one access point 3. The access point 3 includes a wireless transceiver 5. The wireless transceiver communicates with wireless stations 7 and 9 in the vicinity.

[17] The transceiver 5 is connected to a control unit 11. The control unit 11 is connected to a memory 13 and a bridge or router 15. The router 15 is connected to a server

17, either via a hardwired connection or via a wireless connection (as illustrated in Figure 1). The server 17 is, in turn, connected to peripheral devices, such as a printer 19, a modem 21 and a database 23. It should be noted that the bridge or router 15 need not be directly connected to a local server. A server could be anywhere in the Intranet, or Internet, if a suitable network configuration is provided. The primary function of the access point is to act as a bridge to allow communications between wireless stations (in which case a server is not required) and/or to allow communications between wireless stations and some infrastructure connected to the access point (which may or may not include a server).

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278 PCT/US2003/015073

Attorney Docket No. 3655-0133FPC

[18] With reference to Figure 2, a physical allocation of the wireless LAN in a small business will be described. A small business is located within a building defined by outside perimeter walls 25. A parking lot 27 is provided at the entrance to the business.

119] Inside the perimeter walls 25 are a plurality of interior walls 29 defining individual offices 31 and workspaces 33. The server 17 is located in one of the workspaces 33. The server 17 has a hardwired connection to the printer 19 and the modem 21. A personnel, customer, and production database is located on a hard drive, internal to the server 17. The server 17 also includes a wireless connection to a first access point 41 and a second access point 43.

[20] Employees of the business are provided with stations, such as laptops. The laptops are connectable to either one of the first or second access points 41, 43 via a wireless connection. Three authorized stations are illustrated, i.e. a first station 45, a second station 47 and a third station 49. Each station 45, 47, 49 will communicate with a closest access point

41, 43. Employees may take their laptops to and from various offices and workspaces without interruption of their connection to the server 17. As an authorized station 45, 47, 49 travels within the business, the station 45, 47, 49 is handed-off to a closest access point 41,

43, so that an adequate signal strength is maintained.

[21] Figure 2 also illustrates an unauthorized fourth station 51. The authorized fourth station 51 is located in a car 53 in the parking lot 27. The unauthorized station 51 is sufficiently close to the second access point 43 to send signals to, and receive signals from, the second access point 43. Thus, a person in the parked car 53 has the opportunity to gain access to the wireless LAN.

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278 PCT/US2003/015073

Attorney Docket No. 3655-0133FPC

[22J In a wireless LAN in accordance with the background art, this person might view sensitive personnel and business data, or corrupt program or data files with a computer virus. However, in the present invention, the system components, and method of operation, act to prevent access to the wireless LAN by the unauthorized fourth station 51.

[23] With reference to the flow chart of Figure 3, the operation of the system components, in accordance with the present invention, will be described. In step SI00, an association request is received from a station seeking to connect to the wireless LAN. The request is received by the transceiver 5. The transceiver 5 passes the request to the control unit 11.

[24] In step SI02, the control unit 11 measures the signal strength (SS) of the request. Next, in Step SI06, the control unit 11 compares the measured signal strength to a predetermined threshold value stored in the memory 13. If the measured signal strength is greater than the predetermined threshold value, the system concludes that the station is within the confines of the business’s outer perimeter walls 25. Therefore, the process proceeds to step SI08. In step SI08, the control unit 11 allows the station to communicate with the server 17 or with other stations on the wireless LAN, via the router 15. Of course, key codes, user names, and passwords, may also be checked by the access point 3 or server 17 prior to allowing a station full access to the wireless LAN.

[25] If the measured signal strength in step SI02 is not greater than the predetermined threshold value (as determined by the comparison step SI06), the process proceeds to step SI 10. In step SI 10, the control unit 11 prevents the station from communicating with the server 17 and with other stations on the wireless LAN by denying

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278 PCT/US2003/015073

Attorney Docket No. 3655-0133FPC access to the router 15. It is also an option that the control unit 11 can send a message to the station, informing the station that it is out of range.

[26] By the above arrangement, it is possible to prevent a wireless station from gaining access to the wireless LAN, when the station is positioned outside of a designated geographical area, such as outside of the perimeter walls 25 of the business. This will reduce the likelihood of an unscrupulous person tampering with the wireless LAN by “parking-lot hacking.”

[27] Since a wireless LAN can be installed in a business having a floor plan of any configuration or size, there would be no single predetermined threshold value which would be suitable for all installations. Therefore, it is envisioned that the predetermined threshold value would be experimentally determined at the time of installation by a technician or by the end user. During installation, a technician would take a station and travel entirely within the geographical area to be served by the access point of the wireless LAN. Measurements would be made of the signal strength of the technician’s station in this geographical area to form a first set of measured signal strengths.

[28] Next, the technician would take the station just outside the geographical area to be serviced by the access point. Signal strength measurement would be again taken, this time to form a second set of measured signal strengths. The predetermined threshold value would be set to reside somewhere in the margin between the first and second sets of measured signal strengths. Of course, it would be possible to obtain only the first set of measured signal strengths and set the predetermined threshold value slightly less than the lowest measured signal strength. In a wireless LAN having more than one access point, the

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278 PCT/US2003/015073

Attorney Docket No. 3655-0133FPC process would be repeated to determine a predetermined threshold value for each access point.

[29] Some airlines offer a lounge at an airport terminal, which has a wireless LAN. Waiting passengers can access the wireless LAN using their own laptop, or can use a laptop supplied by the lounge attendant. Figure 4 is a floor plan for a wireless LAN, in accordance with the present invention, employed in a lounge area of an airport. Figure 4 also illustrates a wireless LAN which does not include a local server.

[30] In Figure 4, a lounge 100 is defined by structural walls 101. In the lounge 100, there are a plurality of tables 103 and seats 105, such as chairs and couches. Travelers, relaxing or working in the lounge, can operate portable wireless stations, such as a fifth station 107 and a sixth station 109. The fifth and sixth stations 107 and 109 communicate with a third access point 111, positioned inside of an attendant's area 113. The third access point 111 is hardwired to a personal computer 115.

[31] In the arrangement of Figure 4, it is an object of the present invention to discriminate the authorized fifth and sixth stations 107 and 109, inside the lounge 100, from an unauthorized, seventh station 117 in a restaurant 120 outside of the lounge 100. The present invention would classify the seventh station 117 in the restaurant 120 as an unauthorized station, via the method of Figure 3. Therefore, the seventh station 117 would be denied access to the wireless LAN established in the lounge 100.

[32] Figure 4 illustrates that the present invention is applicable to situations wherein only a portion of a building, instead of an entire building, is defined as the authorized geographical area of the wireless LAN. In Figure 4, the authorized geographical area is defined within interior walls 101 of an airport terminal. It should be noted that it is within the

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278 PCT/US2003/015073

Attorney Docket No. 3655-O133FPC scope of the present invention to establish an authorized geographical area which is not defined by walls, but merely a radius from the access point.

[33] It is also an object of the present invention to verify that authorized stations remain within the authorized geographical area. This prevents an unscrupulous hacker from briefly entering the authorized geographical area, establishing a connection to the wireless LAN, and then leaving the authorized geographical area while maintaining the connection to the wireless LAN. For example, a hacker could conceal a laptop computer in a briefcase and walk into a business, under the premise of asking directions to a nearby building. Once inside the business, the laptop could be automatically programmed to connect to the wireless LAN. Since the laptop would actually be within the authorized geographical area, a sufficient signal strength would be present, and the method of Figure 3 would characterize the station (e.g. laptop) as an authorized station. After the hacker leaves the business, the hacker could sit in the parking lot and access the wireless LAN.

[34] Figure 5 is a flow chart illustrating a method of ensuring that authorized stations on the wireless LAN remain within the authorized geographical area. In step S120, the control unit 11 checks a timer value. The timer value could be an internal clock of a CPU of the control unit 11, or any other timing device. In step SI22, it is determined if the timer value has elapsed, or if a designated time period has passed. If not, the process returns to step

SI 20.

[35] If the timer has lapsed, the process continues to step SI24. In step SI24, a signal strength of all of the stations on the wireless LAN is measured. Also in step SI24, a total number of the stations on the wireless LAN is noted and a variable i is set equal to 1. Then, the process goes to step SI26.

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278 PCT/US2003/015073

Attorney Docket No. 3655-0133FPC

[36] In step SI26, the signal strength (SS) of the station(i), e.g. the first station on the wireless LAN, is compared in the predetermined threshold value stored in the memory 13. If the signal strength exceeds the predetermined threshold value, the process goes to step

S128.

[37] In step SI28, the variable i is incremented and the process returns to step SI26. Therefore, the next station's signal strength, e.g. the second station's signal strength, is compared to the predetermined threshold value. If a station's signal strength is less than the predetermined threshold value, the method goes to step SI30.

[38] In step SI30, the control unit evaluates an access control policy stored in the memory 13. The access control policy sets the standards for dealing with a station which passes outside of the authorized geographical area. There can be a universal access control policy for all stations. However, in a preferred embodiment, different stations, as identified by their unique key codes, are treated differently when they pass outside of the authorized geographical area. For example: (1) certain stations could be seamlessly operated outside of the authorized geographical area; (2) certain stations could be provided with a warning signal causing a display indicting that the user should return to the authorized geographical area; (3) certain stations could be allowed to continue a data transfer which is in progress, but be foreclosed from initiating any new data transfer; (4) certain stations could be allowed restricted access (e.g. only certain programs on the server could be accessed); (5) a timer could be started which allows certain stations to function in a normal manner for a period of time sufficient to allow the station to return to the authorized geographical area; (6) certain stations could be immediately denied further access to the wireless LAN and/or not associated with the wireless LAN, such as by sending a de-authentication notification to the

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278 PCT/US2003/015073

Attorney Docket No. 3655-0133FPC station. The de-authentication notification would reset the station's state variables, such that the station would be unassociated with the wireless LAN, in accordance with the 802.11 standards. Denying access to the wireless LAN would be transparent to the station (e.g. the station would not receive a transmission from the wireless LAN and hence would not know that access had been denied). Sending a de-authentication notification would not be transparent to the station.

[39] It would also be possible to provide different timer values for different stations. In other words, each station could have its own unique timer value. A check would be made to see if a particular station had left the authorized geographical area after the lapse of the timer value associated with that particular station. For example, one station would be checked every three minutes, while another station would be checked every ten minutes.

[40] Step S132 illustrates the situation when policies (1) and (6) are in place. In Step SI32, if the policy associated with the particular station outside of the authorized geographical area calls for policy (1), processing proceeds to step SI34. In step SI34, the station is allowed to seamlessly remain on the wireless LAN. If the policy associated with the particular station outside of the authorized geographical area calls for policy (6), processing proceeds to step S136. In step S136, the station is denied further access to the wireless LAN and/or the station is not associated.

[41] After either of step S134 or step S136, the process goes to step S138. In step

SI38, the control unit 11 checks to see if the last station on the wireless LAN has been evaluated. If not, the variable i is incremented in step SI28, and the next station is evaluated. If so, the process returns to step SI20 and waits for a period. After, the period lapses, the control unit again reevaluates all of the stations on the wireless LAN. The period

CA 02489698 2004-12-16

WO 2004/004278 PCT/US2003/015073

Attorney Docket No. 3655-0133FPC of steps S120 and S122 may be selectively set by the installer or end user, e.g., three minutes, seconds.

[42] By the present invention, it is possible to define an authorized geographical area, inside of which stations can connect to a wireless LAN and outside of which stations cannot connect to the wireless LAN. The geographical area can be inferred by relying on a measured signal strength of the station seeking a connection to the wireless LAN. This method can be very accurate since walls, especially outside walls, tend to greatly weaken or attenuate wireless signals. Thus, it is possible to discriminate between authorized stations within certain walls and unauthorized stations outside of those walls. This arrangement counteracts the parking lot scenario, wherein an unauthorized person gains access to a wireless LAN, while sitting in a car parked adjacent to a business, hotel, person's house, etc.

[43] The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.