Daylighting system comprising light redirection elements in a venetian blind

Application No: 2008200367 (22)

Priority Data

Number

2007901018

Publication Date:

Publication Journal Date: Accepted Journal Date:

Applicant(s)

Ian Edmonds

Inventor(s)

Edmonds, Ian Robert (32) Date

2007.02.28

2008.09.11

2008.09.11

2009.08.27

Date of Filing: 2008.01.24 (33) Country

AU

Agent / Attorney

Ian Robert Edmonds, 12 Lentara Street, Kenmore, QLD, 4069

Related Art

US 4773733

EDITORIAL NOTE

APPLICATION NO. 2008200367

This specification contains two pages numbered 10.

2008200367 24 Jan 2008

Abstract.

A daylighting system comprises light redirecting elements inserted between the slats of a conventional Venetian blind and supported by the Venetian blind. Each light redirecting element is a strip of reflective material folded into an angle section. The top arm of the angle section reflects sunlight upwards through the Venetian blind and deeply into the interior of the building. The vertical side arm of the angle section reflects sunlight back out of the window. The reflecting surface of the top arm of the light redirecting elements is treated to reflect light diffusely into a narrow angular range.

2008200367 24 Jan 2008

<img file="AU2008200367B2_D0001.tif" />

ΙΌ

LL

2008200367 24 Jan 2008

Daylighting system comprising light redirection elements in a Venetian blind.

Background.

A horizontal louver is an effective means of controlling the input of radiant heat through a window. The Venetian blind is a very cost effective method of implementing a variable tilt horizontal louver. As a result the Venetian blind is one of the most commonly used and inexpensive means for controlling radiant heat gain through windows. However, tilting the Venetian blind to block radiant input compromises the ability of the Venetian blind to redirect natural light into the deep interior of buildings. The reason for this is illustrated in the section view of a Venetian blind, Fig 1. A typical Venetian comprises an array of slats 1 supported by strings 4 running between vertical supporting strings 2 and 3. Sunlight 8 incident through window glass 14 is blocked by the slats 1 and diffusely reflected into a wide range of directions 11. A proportion of this sunlight is reflected to the outside, a proportion is inter-reflected between the slats 1 and is absorbed by the blind and a relatively small proportion is reflected into the building illuminating the region of the room close to the Venetian blind. The relative proportions reflected to the outside and inside depend on the tilt, spacing, curvature and reflectance of the blind slats. It may be noted that when tilted to block incoming sunlight the blind still allows a reasonable view to the 20 outside as illustrated by ray path 10 in Fig 1.

The objective of the present invention is to improve the daylighting performance of a conventional Venetian blind by inserting simple light redirection elements between the slats of the blind so that a much higher proportion of the incoming sunlight is redirected through the blind and over the ceiling in the deep interior of the building.

2008200367 24 Jan 2008

A considerable amount of prior art relates to horizontal louver type systems for installation in windows to improve daylighting. Bartenbach, 5,388,000 describes a louver of concave, partly perforated reflectors. Zillig, 4,351,588 describes a louver of reflectors, concave on the upper surface and V shaped planar on the lower surface, that can be rotated between double glazing for daylighting a room. Bartenbach, 5,517,960 describes a louver of slats containing prismatic rods. Koster 6,240,999, 6,367,937 and 6,845,805 describes louvers of complex shape designed to reject specific angular ranges of light and admit other angular ranges of light. All the prior art mentioned above require the installation of specialized louvered arrangements for the redirection of daylight. In particular none of the prior art teaches the use of the familiar and commonly available Venetian blind as an integral part of a daylighting system. Further the louver elements outlined in the prior art are complex in shape having a multiplicity of surfaces, up to ten surfaces in the case of Kosters designs, or perforated surfaces or specialized surfaces such as prismatic surfaces or surfaces with prismatic rods. None of these prior art systems are suited to conversion of a standard Venetian blind but would require replacement of a standard Venetian blind with the particular specialized louver system.

Summary of the invention

The daylighting system of this invention comprises light redirecting elements inserted between the slats of a conventional Venetian blind. Each light redirecting element is a strip of reflective material folded into an angle section. The top arm of the angle section reflects sunlight upwards through the Venetian blind and deeply into the interior of the building. The vertical side arm of the angle section reflects sunlight 25 downwards and back out of the window. The reflecting surface of the top arm of the

2008200367 24 Jan 2008 light redirecting element is treated to diffusely reflect the sunlight into a narrow angular range centered on the specular direction of reflection.

List of Figures

Fig 1. A section view of a conventional Venetian blind.

Fig 2 A schematic view of the light redirecting element of this invention

Fig 3. A section view showing light redirecting elements inserted into a conventional Venetian blind.

Fig 4. A section view illustrating the diffusion of reflected light by the light 10 redirecting elements.

Fig 5. A section view illustrating the performance of the daylighting system of this invention when installed in the window of a room.

Detailed description of the invention.

As illustrated in Fig 2 the light redirecting elements 5 of this invention comprise strips of reflective material folded into an angle section comprising an upper arm 6 and a vertical side arm 7. As illustrated in Fig 3 the light redirecting elements 5 are inserted and supported on the upper surface of the slats 1 of a Venetian blind to produce the 20 daylighting system of this invention 15. The folding of the reflective material to produce light redirecting elements 5 is such as to produce an acute angle between arm 6 and arm 7. The acute angle is in the range 70 to 90 degrees. The other dimensions of the element depend on the dimensions of the Venetian blind into which the element will be inserted to form the daylighting system. The dimensions of a basic Venetian 25 blind are defined by the width, a, of the slats and the spacing, b, between the slats.

2008200367 24 Jan 2008

The typical dimensions of the light redirecting elements 5 relative to the dimensions of the combining Venetian blind are: width of the upper arm 6 is substantially one half the width of the Venetian blind slat, that is a/2 and the width or height of the side arm 7 is substantially one half of the spacing between the slats, that is b/2. The 5 overall length of the elements is substantially the same length as the length of the

Venetian slat. However, for ease of insertion the light redirecting elements may be made shorter in length than the length of the slats. For example, the length of the light redirecting elements may be made substantially one half the length of the Venetian slats with two such elements inserted end to end between pairs of slats so that the 10 redirecting surfaces extend over the total length of the slats. The light redirecting elements 5 of this invention are inserted between the slats 1 of a Venetian blind as illustrated in Fig 3. An element 5 is inserted to the window side of the Venetian blind and is supported in position by the slat 1 and the front supporting string 3. Sunlight ray 8 is reflected from the surface of arm 6 of the element 5 into an output ray 9 that 15 transfers sunlight through the blind and into the interior.

An important feature of this invention is the treatment of the upper reflective surface of arm 6 and the treatment of the side surface of arm 7 of the redirecting elements 5. One treatment is applied to make the upper reflective surface of arm 6 reflect 20 diffusely into a narrow angular range, typically about 20 degrees angular width on either side of the direction of specular reflection. A second treatment is applied to make arm 7 reflect into a wide angular range. The desired effect of the treatment of the surfaces of arms 6 and 7 of the elements 5 is illustrated in Fig 4 which shows a section view of a Venetian blind with redirecting elements 5 inserted in the blind.

Sunlight rays 8 and 12 are incident on the element 5 from outside the window 14 in

2008200367 24 Jan 2008 which the daylighting system is installed. Sunlight ray 8 is diffusely reflected by upper surface of arm 6 into a light output of narrow angular width 9 that is transmitted into the room to be illuminated. Sunlight ray 12 is diffusely reflected by the surface of vertical arm Ί into a light output of wide angular width 13 that is transmitted out 5 through the window 14 against which the daylighting system is installed.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention the treatment of the surface of arm 6 of the redirecting elements is a uni-directional roughening of the surface to make the surface diffusely reflecting in the vertical plane. The uni-directional roughening can 10 be achieved by roughening the surface of arm 6 by lightly sanding the surface along the length of the element 5 with fine emery paper. Alternatively the uni-directional roughening can be achieved by uni-directional rolling of the reflective strip prior to folding into an angle section. When the reflective strip is comprised of thin metal that has been formed by rolling into a thin sheet the intrinsic uni-directional surface 15 roughness associated with the rolling process can provide the desired diffuse reflectance of the surface of arm 6 of the element.

In a second embodiment of the invention the diffusion of reflected light from surfaces of arms 6 is achieved by forming the arm 6 with a slight convex curvature prior to or 20 after folding into an angle section.

The purpose of diffusely reflecting sunlight from upper arm 6 of the light redirecting elements 5 is to spread the reflected sunlight over a wide extent of the ceiling of the room being illuminated. This desired effect is illustrated in Fig 5 which shows the 25 daylighting system of this invention installed in the window of a room. As indicated

2008200367 24 Jan 2008 in Fig 5 the light redirecting elements 5 are inserted between the slats in the upper half of the Venetian blind. Typically, incident sunlight 8 is diffusely reflected from upper arm 6 of each of the elements into an output 9 that is spread over a wide extent of the ceiling of the room. As the diffuse reflected light is of limited angular extent the light output 9 into the room is above horizontal and, therefore, does not constitute a glare source for occupants in the room. A primary reason for placing the light redirecting elements only in the upper part of the Venetian blind is that, ideally, the lowest element inserted in the Venetian blind should be at or above head height of a standing occupant so as to avoid reflected light from the element entering the view of the 10 occupant. A view out of the room through the daylighting system is provided to occupants as illustrated by rays 10 in Fig 5.

The purpose of diffusely reflecting sunlight at the vertical side arm 7 of the elements is to reduce the potential of reflected sunlight from the side arm becoming a source of 15 glare discomfort for people outside the building. In principle any surface treatment that diffuses or spreads the reflected light into a wide angular range will achieve the above purpose. Thus a general roughening rather than a uni-directional roughening will achieve the desired effect. A general roughening producing a diffuse reflectance of wide angular extent can be achieved by circular sanding the surfaces of the light 20 redirecting element 5 with course emery paper or by sand blasting the surface or by painting the surface to achieve a low gloss or matt finish on the surface.

The depth to which sunlight can be reflected into a room can be adjusted by altering the tilt of the Venetian blind. For example a tilt through 5 degrees inwards lowers the 25 angle of the light redirected into the room through ten degrees. However, maintaining

2008200367 24 Jan 2008 a tilt of the Venetian that blocks most of the sunlight incident on the lower part of the blind not containing elements 5 is desirable in order to reduce radiant input to the building. The relative amount of sunlight admitted and redirected by elements 5 deep into the room can be adjusted by varying the number of elements 5 inserted into the upper part of the Venetian blind. In effect the shading coefficient of the daylighting system can be varied by varying the number of elements inserted into the upper part of the blind.

The luminance of a conventional Venetian blind can be high if the slats are highly reflecting, for example if the slats are white. The high luminance may have an adverse effect on the visibility of computer screens being viewed within a room with Venetian blinds. This problem can be reduced by using Venetian blinds of a darker colour, for example blue, green or brown blinds. However, now the daylighting performance of a dark coloured conventional Venetian blind is further reduced below that of light colored conventional Venetian blind. However, the daylighting system of this invention circumvents this problem as, with the daylighting system of this invention, the transfer of daylight to the interior is largely independent of the color of the combining Venetian blind. Referring to Fig 5 the light transferred to the interior 9 is reflected from the surface of the top arm 6 of the redirecting element 5. This light does not provide a luminance problem for computer screens as it illuminates the 20 ceiling resulting in a ceiling of high luminance. Bright sources on the ceiling are much less of a luminance problem when viewing computer screens than windows are as computer screens are close to vertical and reflected images of the ceiling are much less observable in the screens than reflected images of windows. Where colored Venetian blinds are used as part of the daylighting system of this invention it may be 25 desirable for aesthetic reasons that the surface of the vertical arm 7 of the redirecting

2008200367 31 Jul 2009 element 5 be treated with matt finish paint of the same color as the color of the Venetian blind. Alternatively, the vertical arm 7 may be finished in matt white to enhance the radiant heat rejection of the system.

2008200367 31 Jul 2009